The component requires the URL of the zipped file for the specific climate that you want to import from the DOE's website.
Provided by Ladybug 0. Kernel as gh. TLS 1. Component : return - 1. AddRuntimeMessage w , warning. Zip' :. AddRuntimeMessage w , warning1. AddRuntimeMessage w , warning2. Thanks Chris!
You're very welcome. I will contact a number of people to see if we can upload MeteoNorm files to epwmap. Meanwhile it is only files from DOE website. I'm looking forward to hearing what you find from the MeteoNorm people and I agree that the download EPW component should go to the epwMap now.
I've tried with different cities, all created by Meteonorm, but the result files are blank. My guess is that your energy model is failing because of how you have set up your HBZones or for some reason other than the weather file. I would recommend starting a new discussion if this seems to be the case and you are not able to run your simulation with non-Meteonorm files as well.
Thank you for your input. I assumed that it was the Meteonorm Weather Files because the simulation does give outputs when I use weather files downloaded from the EnergyPlus website but it does not when I use Meteonorm weather files it does for daylight though.
You wrote "annually" and it should be "annual". The previous component version didn't check that. But this is just a bet. Now is fixed. The so so ones: some of your zones are open breps. See red arrows comparing this output with the one from anh HBZones output. This can be fine but as a default i would say that it isn't. I'll recommend to fix this. So i set it to False. Thanks in advanced! Hi Chris, Thank you for your input. I attach the model and the weather file in case it is of any help. Thanks, Blanca energyTest.
Hi Blanca, Some good news and some … so so news. The good ones: It runs. I updated the file to the last version from the github. See attached. See attached for all that. I copied the first part below the previous one. Hi Abraham, thank you so much for your time and help.
Thank you so much: I am happy you got to learn a couple of thing on the way! Abraham, WeatherAnalytics makes you pay for EPW data that they fabricate from other climate data sets. The DragonFly project sounds interesting. Please update the progress on it. The interface in Revit seems to be quite limited in terms of what it passes to Energy Plus in comparison to what Energy Plus could do with a different interface.
As far as I can see, the weather files used by Revit are hosted on an Autodesk cloud server and the only way to select them is by defining the project location or weather station. Yes, I'm pretty sure there is a way to do it, but it requires you to learn how to use dynamo to a pretty advanced level, and that's way beyond my ability or time. Since posting this question I've had to re-orient and learn openstudio to create thoroughly simplified versions of my models and fight off the hundreds of bugs and crashes that come with that workflow.
Unfortunately I'd planned on getting sensible results weeks ago, and I'm only just starting to get them now with barely a week to write them all up! Notably the results are in the completely unfiltered form OpenStudio puts them out in since the BCL server is currently not issuing new keys to use any OpenStudio measures including output graphs and troubleshooting as they're moving to GitHub.
I put way too much time into perfecting the Revit models before realising they were a dead end! Or at the least, beyond my competence to fix. Still, thanks for takign the time to answer me, and to research the problem. It's greatly appreciated! Revit MEP Forum.
0コメント